A practical diagnosis
Review of code, dependencies, authentication, data and deployment.
LOOPUS.techapps.loopus.techThe demo looks promising, but access control, payments or bugs are blocking launch? I review the existing foundation and handle the agreed fixes needed for a controlled production release.

For founders and teams with an existing prototype who need to know what can stay, where the risks are and how to move forward.
Review of code, dependencies, authentication, data and deployment.
Permissions and Supabase RLS, data exposure, secrets, payments and server functions as relevant to your stack.
Work on the existing foundation where appropriate, with a scope agreed after the audit.
Critical journey tests, production configuration, documentation and handover.

Security audit, Supabase hardening, UX improvements and product handover.
Read the case study
Recovery of a Manus prototype into an independent, usable platform.
Read the case studyThe audit is a separate paid engagement, quoted according to product size and required access. Corrections are scoped separately. Your own team can use the findings; a complete rewrite is not assumed.
Let’s discuss your projectDescribe the product, stack and launch blockers.
Scope an audit with a risk review, priorities and a correction estimate.
Choose what follows: take the plan to your team or agree a scoped implementation.
Describe the project, what exists and what is blocking you. You’ll receive a direct view of the safest next step.
Not automatically. The audit reviews code, data and product constraints, then explains what can remain in place.
No secrets are needed in the first message. Required repository, staging and service access is arranged afterwards through an appropriate channel with limited permissions.
No. Scope, remaining risks and acceptance criteria are explicit. Testing focuses on critical journeys, data and payments.
Describe the context, what already exists and your goal. You’ll receive a direct human response.